over at this website essential Needs Model of Stakeholder equilibrium
Today's leaders face increased challenges due to "globalization, information technology, and manufactures consolidation" (Kanter, 2000, ¶ 2). Additionally, the loss of group trust due to accounting scandals and ethical misconduct has created a hostile marketplace. They must navigate their organizations through these turbulent times by leading with a "sense of purpose and a guiding vision" (Maak & Pless, 2006, ¶ 1). The leader must equilibrium the organizational demands with the uncertainly of the external environment.
essential Needs Model of Stakeholder equilibrium
The external environment affects an organization's passage to resources. Jones (2004) states, "Customers, distributors, unions, competitors, suppliers, and the government are all leading covering stakeholders who can sway and pressure organizations to act in inescapable ways" (p. 62). By applying leadership and administration principles, the leader can plan for interruptions in resources. Jones (2004) writes "In the global environment, supplies of inputs can be obtained not just from domestic sources but from any country in the world" (p. 64). The Council on Library and information Resources (2005) states, "Because external environmental factors and management's tone sway the organization's ability to meet its objectives, it is leading that administration understand the significance of these elements" (Managing company Risk, ¶ 15).
Meeting the "conflicting demands of dissimilar stakeholders," (Loo, 2002, ¶ 4) is the accountability of a firm's leadership. This is no easy feat balancing the needs of internal stakeholders with the needs of external stakeholders and aligning the needs of these conflicting constituents with the mission and goals of the organization. The mission statement is the outward face to external stakeholders. Jones (2004) writes, "When managers originate a set of goals to quantum organizational effectiveness, they must make sure that the official goals and operative goals work together to heighten effectiveness (p. 22). In increasing to the organizational mission and goals, leaders must invent communication skills to equilibrium the competing demands between internal and external stakeholders.
Effectively managing stakeholder expectations requires the leader to recognize the information needs of the assorted stakeholders. Balancing the information needed or requested by the stakeholders with the needs of the organization, requires evaluating the communication requirements of each stakeholder group. Communicating clear and concise information aids in understanding.
Combining leadership, the mission, and strategy of the organization, and productive communication provides leaders with the tools to equilibrium the competing needs and demands of internal and external stakeholders. Outline 1 represents the needful Needs Model of Stakeholder Balance. The model represents a signpost reminder for leaders who must articulate the delicate equilibrium between the needs of inside and covering constituents.
Components of the needful Needs Model of Stakeholder Balance
This section will review the components of the needful Needs Model of Stakeholder Balance. The model evolves from a metaphor of a scale in balance. The scale base represents the need for a solid foundation to sustain organizational structure. The implementation of leadership system forms this foundation. The pedestal of the scale is formed from the mission and strategy of the organization. The mission "describes the company's product, market, and technological areas of emphasis in a way that reflects the values and priorities" (Pearce & Robinson, 2003, pp. 13-14) of the organization. The cross bar of the model is represented by communication between the stakeholder groups, acting as a bridge to understanding. In each of the isolate scales, reside the internal and external stakeholders, whose competing demands could unbalance the organization. It is the accountability of the leaders of the club to recognize and equilibrium the stakeholder needs by shifting the weights of stakeholder needs, holding the scale in delicate balance. The following description will further build on the components of the needful Needs Model of Stakeholder Balance.
Leadership
The foundation of the needful Needs Model of Stakeholder equilibrium is built from leadership theory. Northouse (2004) writes, "Burns grand between two types of leadership: transactional and transformational. Transactional leadership refers to the bulk of leadership models, which focus on the exchanges that occur between leaders and their followers" (p. 170). Transactional leadership is displayed when a leader motivates his followers by gift a punish-and-reward system in regard to their achievements. One of the roots for this system can be seen in power system through the use of recompense and coercive power. Transactional leadership occurs in situations where the leader comes from strong positional power and is relatively task oriented (Bass, 1990).
The transformational leadership model was born in the work of "Burns (1978), Bass (1985), Bennis and Nanus (1985), and Tichy and DeVanna (1986)" (Northouse, 2004, p. 198). Burns (1978), identified that there was a relationship between leaders and their followers that was of a higher-level than the purely transactional relationship of management. He termed this relationship as transforming because these emotional bonds lead to change within the leaders and the followers.
Bass' study describes the needful differences in the workforce today versus the workforce of the 1950s. The workforce of today has a higher level of education. Employees accept increased accountability at all levels of the organization. Bass observed a decrease in loyalty to a company or a single job and the unabridged growth in employees' own self-interest (Bass, 1999). These changes in the workforce make the characteristics of transformational leadership a necessity in many instances. The leader must be able to adjust their leadership style to the situation to introduce the changes needed to reach organizational goals. "The transformational leader raises our level of consciousness about the significance and value of designated outcomes, ...to transcend our own self-interest for the sake of the team, [or] organization, ...and advance our range of wants and needs" (Doyle & Smith, 2001, p. 5).
The transformational leader creates an enjoyable and rewarding environment for themselves and their followers. In the past, a leader could carry on their followers by directing the work attempt and by monitoring their output. Today the leader must be able to sway their followers' behavior, sell the vision, and stir emotional commitment. Leaders must have a clear vision, which employees may embrace and assume ownership. This call to action requires emotional commitment from the leader and the followers, one towards another. Once the leadership has industrialized a solid foundation, it is needful to build upon this foundation through the organization's mission and strategy.
Mission and Strategy
The mission statement is the outward face to external stakeholders. Pearce and Robinson (2003) state, "Organizational culture has been recognized as a pervasive sway on organizational life. Organizational culture, ...is the shared beliefs and values of an organization's members" (p. 305). The key for achieving the organizational goals and the integration of departments, lies in the ability of the leader to originate a shared vision, enable staff, invent strong relationships between company units, invent productive teams, and articulate focus on the mission. A mission statement has a principle value of providing guidance to the whole club by articulating clearly its long-term intentions, goals, and expectations (Pearce & Robinson).
Value creation for a global company must be viewed through a dissimilar lens than customary corporate strategy. Corporate strategy and value creation in the past were focused on how effectively a company could build a buyer niche market, service it, and articulate competing positioning (Bodily & Venkataraman, 2004). The global era has revised that coming by requiring clubs to be more adept at changing to meet shop needs and competing pressures. With the pedestal firmly in place the cross bar may be added to the model. The cross bar is formed from the communications the leadership posits. The communications form a bridge of comprehension between the club and its constituents.
Communication
Communication is more than just sending and receiving a message. comprehension what information the stakeholder needs and how they want to receive it, requires thoughtful investigation and inquiry. dissimilar stakeholders will want dissimilar types of information as well and dissimilar forms of delivery. Shareholders will want information describing the financial stability of the company. Maak and Pless (2006), state that, "Responsible leaders safeguard shareholders' venture capital and ensure an adequate return. They respect their ownership and ensure regular communication and transparent reporting on the economic, social, and ecological execution of the corporation" (p. 4).
Internal stakeholders, the employees, and senior administration will need differing types of information. Leaders must have "The ability to get all [stakeholders] affected by a task involved, to ensure their sustain and commitment" (Recklies, 2001, ¶ 5). Recklies (2001) argues that leaders must be skilled in emotional intelligence "...this includes the ability to communicate, to understand, and to take into catalogue opinions and doubts of others" (¶ 5).
Bridging the gaps between internal and external stakeholders requires the leader to be skilled in communication analysis, stakeholder analysis, and communication technology. Knowing what to say and how to say it goes a long way in developing stakeholder relationships.
Stakeholder Theory
Freeman (1984) opened the conference on stakeholder system presenting the first systematic evaluation (Maak & Pless, 2006). Stakeholder system has evolved to encompass not just a means to an end but "a moral comprehension of stakeholders being ends in themselves-individuals/groups with [their] own interests that the firm was constructed to serve" (Freeman & Gilbert, 1989, as cited in Maak & Pless, 2006, p. 6).Maak and Pless (2006) write,
Freeman et al. (2004), stakeholder system starts with the assumption that values are necessarily and explicitly a part of doing business. It asks managers to articulate the shared sense of the value they create, and what brings its core stakeholders together. It also pushes managers to be clear about how they want to do business, specifically what kinds of relationships they want and need to originate with their stakeholders to deliver on their purpose'' (364). (pp. 6-7)
Two questions must be asked in stakeholder theory, "'what is the purpose of the firm?'' (Freeman et al., 2004: 364, as cited in Maak & Pless, 2006, p. 6) and ''what accountability does administration have to stakeholders?'' (Freeman et al., 2004: 364, as cited in Maak & Pless, 2006, p. 6). It is leading that the leadership of the club understand that there is value in investing in the interests and relationships of the stakeholders (Maak & Pless, 2006) but these relationships must be balanced with the needs of the organization. To do so requires the leader to give a weight to each stakeholder and to each competing demand.
Balancing Weights
In the needful Needs Model of Stakeholder Balance, the final pieces are the weights. The leader must decide what value to assign each need/weight, if the need is needful to the stakeholder and if that need/weight affects the organization. Each need/weight must be weighed against the mission and strategy of the club and trades offs may be required due to puny resources. It is the duty of the leadership to articulate the delicate equilibrium between achieving the organizational goals and meeting the needs of the internal and external stakeholders.
Conclusion
The needful Needs Model of Stakeholder equilibrium uses the metaphor of the scale in balance, with internal stakeholders on one side and external stakeholders on the other. The competing needs of the stakeholders as the weights. The leader must articulate the delicate equilibrium of the scale, using care to rate the needs of the stakeholders to those of the organization, its mission and goals, and communicating the decisions made to the assorted stakeholders.
By applying the transformational and transactional leadership theories, the leader is good able to make informed and valued decisions. The model is a signpost, built to guide and remind the leader of the vigor of the club and the value that the stakeholders bring to the organization.
References
Bass, B. (1990). Handbook of leadership: Theory, study & managerial applications, (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Bass, B. (1999). Two Decades of study and development in Transformational Leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9-32.
Bodily, S. & Venkataraman, S. (2004). Not walls, windows: capturing value in the digital age. Journal of company Strategy, 25(3), 15-25.
Council on Library and information Resources. (2005). Appendix I: The company risk model. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.clir.org/Pubs/reports/pub90/appendix1.html
Doyle, M. E., & Smith, M. K. (2001). Classical leadership. The encyclopedia of informal education, 5(1), 3-15.
Heldman, K. (2005). Pmp: task administration pro study guide, (3rd ed.). Hoboken, Nj: Wiley Publishing, Inc.
Jones, G.R. (2004). Organizational Theory, Design, and Change, (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, Nj: Prentice Hall.
Kanter, R. M. (2000). The enduring skills of change leaders. Ivey company Journal, 64(5), 31-37.
Loo, R. (2002). The Delphi method: A grand tool for strategic management. Policing, 25(4), 762-770.
Maak, T. & Pless, N. M. (2006). Responsible leadership in a stakeholder society: A Relational perspective. Journal of company Ethics, 66, 99-115.
Northouse, P. (2004). Leadership: system and Practice, (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca: Sage Publications, Inc.
Pearce, J. A, & Robinson, R. B. (2003). Strategic management: Formulation, implementation, and control, (8th ed.). Ny: McGraw-Hill.
Recklies, D. (2001). What makes a good change agent? Retrieved June 16, 2007, from http://www.themanager.org/Strategy/change_agent.htm
No comments:
Post a Comment